The
Nilgiri Tahrs
- the
friends in the ranges
The
western Ghats run along the West coast of South India. It comes
in many different names at various places along the mountains –
the Anamalais, the Sahyadris, the Nilgiris, the High Ranges and
the Cardamom hills. Along the Southern parts of these ranges is
the abode of the Nilgiri Tahr - Hemitragus hylocrius. In the district
of Iddukki, Eravikulam, near Munnar is the home of Nilgiri Tahr(mountain
goat). The tahrs that exist in the High Ranges in kerala are a friendly
lot. They are quite at ease with tourists who gather to catch a
glimpse of them, at times even permitting a friendly pat. The credit
goes to Walter Mackay who first befriended the Nilgiri Tahr. Mackley
was the general manager at Rajamalai tea estate in the early 1950s.
He was a lover of wildlife and a conservator of environment.
When
you are ready with your camera to click a super shot of the animal
thinking he is unaware, he will turn and pose for you and go back
to do its business. And you would have got the friendliest shot
of the mountain goat ever.
|
|
| The
Family |
|
| Tahrs
belong to the family Bovidae which also includes other even-toed,
horned ungulates such as cattle and antelope. They are considered
primitive cousins of true goats (Capra spp.) They possess certain
characteristics of primitive goat-antelopes such as a similarity
of horn size in both males and females and certain other features
that characterise true goats, such as striking coat colour differences
between the sexes, and the presence of odoriferous glands. |
|
| About
The Name |
|
The
Nilgiri tahr was first named Kemas hylocrius by Ogilby (1838). However,
in 1845 Gray re-christened the Nilgiri tahr Capra warryato, changing
this to Kemas warryato in 1852 (Lydekker, 1913). Warryato is an
English rendition of the Tamil term for the Nilgiri tahr. In 1859
Blyth included the Nilgiri tahr in the genus Hemitragus, naming
it H. hylocrius (Lydekker, 1913).The current view is that there
are three species of tahr, the Himalayan tahr (Henitragus jenlahicus),
the Nilgiri tahr (H. hylocrius), and the Arabian tahr- (H. jayakari;
Corbett, 1978; Honaki et al„ 1982; Novak and Paradise, 1983)
There is some variation in the spelling of the English name for
this genus, it appears both as "tahr" and "thar".
Both are an Anglicized form of the Nepali term for serow (Capricornis
sumatraensis; Green, 1978). This apparent misidentification notwithstanding,
"tahr" is the accepted spelling for the Himalayan species,
and is the only spelling used in reference to the Nilgiri and Arabian
species. However, English speaking South Indians rarely refer to
Nilgiri tahr, but rather use the term "ibex" or "Nilgiri
ibex". The Tamil name for Nilgiri tahr is "varai ad"
or "varai adoo" which translates to "cliff goat".
The comparable Malayalam term is "mala adu" (Prater, 1965).
Interestingly, Ogilby (1838) based the original name for Nilgiri
tahr, (Kemas hylocrius) on the understanding that it's local name
was "jungle sheep" (jungle or wood corresponding to the
root "hyla" and the Greek "krios" which means
ram). However, in the English speaking community in the High Range,
"jungle sheep" refers to the barking deer (Muntiacus muntjak),
whereas "ibex" is the longstanding name for Nilgiri tahr
(Jerdon, 1874; Fletcher, 1911). Due to this misidentification, Gray's
(1842) "warryato" is a much more appropriate name, but
Ogilby's (1838) remains as the standard one by rules of precedence.
|
 |
 |
| Physical
characteristics |
|
| Male:
A fully grown male Nilgiri tahr stands about 100 cm at the shoulder
and weighs about 100 kg (Schaller, 1971). The overall coloring is
a deep chocolate brown. This is particularly dark almost black on
the front of the fore- and hind legs, the shoulder, the side of
the abdomen, side of the face and the front of the muzzle. This
contrasts sharply with the white facial stripe which drops from
the forehead towards the corners of the mouth just anterior to the
eyes, the white carpal patches on the front and outside of the forelegs,
and the silvery saddle. The side of the neck where it meets the
shoulder is also sometimes lightened as is the flank posterior to
the saddle, and an area around the eye. Long black hairs form a
mane and mid-dorsal stripe.
The
horns (in both sexes) curve uniformly back, and have twist. The
outside and inside curves are constant. The tips diverge slightly
due to the plane of the horn being divergent from the body axis
posteriorly, and tilted slightly so as to converge dorsally. This
means that the tips continue to diverge the more the horns grow.
The inside surface is nearly flat, and the back and outside are
rounded. There is a distinct rib where the inside and front of the
horns meet and the horn surface covered with numerous fine crenulations
amidst the more slightly more evident annual rings. The horns of
males are heavier and longer than those of the females reaching
a maximum length of about 40 cm.
Female:
Female Nilgiri tahr are shorter and slighter than their male counterparts.
In contrast to the striking pelage of the male, the female is almost
uniformly gray. The carpal patch is black against this light background.
The facial markings are present, but only faintly, and the area
around the eye and the cheek below it are brown. The mane and mid-dorsal
stripe are also present, but much less conspicuous. The horns are
slimmer and shorter, reaching a maximum length of about 26 cm.
|

|
 |
| Other
two tahr species |
|
Himalayan tahr
Male: The male Himalayan tahr is similar in size and build
to the Nilgiri tahr. Its pelage, however, is strikingly different.
The most conspicuous aspect of its pelage is a large full ruff or
mane of long light brown or light gray hair on the lower neck and
shoulders. The flank and front of the hind legs are also covered
with shaggy hair, though not as long as that of the mane. The face
and neck above the mane is black with a medium brown area around
the eyes. There are no carpal markings. The horns diverge much more
widely than those of the Nilgiri tahr, due to a wide posterior divergence
of the plane of the horns, combined with a considerable tilling
so as to converge ventrally. As a result, the tips of the horns
point back towards the neck, and would meet if they grew long enough.
The horns have an irregular cross section, with the rib along the
anterior surface. The horns also have fine crenulations and annual
rings (Caughley, 1965).
Female:
Like the Nilgiri species, the Himalayan tahr female is
nearly uniformly colored. The over-all coloring is medium brown,
and the fronts of the legs are dark brown. There is a definite,
but not conspicuous facial stripe of cream between the browner muzzle
and cheek. The horns are like those of the male, but slimmer and
shorter.
|
 |
|
Arabian tahr
Male: The Arabian tahr is diminutive compared to the two
other species, and most Caprini, as the male stands only about 60
cm at the shoulder (Harrison, 1968). They also have a full mane
on the neck and shoulder which is a light sandy brown. These long
erectile hairs extend along the whole of the back as well. The foreleg
and front of the hind legs are also covered with loose long hair,
and there is a conspicuous tuft of hair on the cheek. The tail is
black, as is the face back to the level of the eye. The horns are
set similar to those of the Nilgiri tahr, with the tips somewhat
more divergent. In shape however, they are quite different, being
compressed and semi-elliptical, with the keel on the leading edge.
Female:
The female Arabian tahr looks somewhat like a scaled down version
of the Nilgiri tahr female, although the coat is a bit browner.
The black carpal patches are present, but slightly less conspicuous,
and in contrast to the other two species, there are conspicuous
facial markings. The area immediately around the eye and below it
are black, and a white line curves around the top-front of the eye
and drops towards the mouth. The stripe widens and diffuses onto
the muzzle, the rest of which is gray.
|
 |
| Population
of Tahrs |
|
|
| Nilgiri
hills |
450 |
| Silent
Valley |
30 |
| Siruveni
Hills |
20
|
| Elival
Mala |
60 |
| Nelliampathi
Hills |
30 |
| Top
Slip & Parambikulam |
120 |
| Eastern
Slopes of Ananmala |
125 |
| Grass
hills of Anamala |
250 |
| Swamaimala |
130 |
| Eravikulam
National Park |
760 |
| High
Range |
30 |
| Palani
Hills |
60 |
| Highwavy
mountains |
100 |
| Mudaliar
oothu |
70 |
| Vellakaltheri |
90 |
| Ashambu
Hills |
70 |
| Thiruvannamalai
peak |
40
|
|
 |
 |
| Habitat |
|
The Nilgiri Tahr's domains are the hills of Southern India, ranging
from the Nilgiri to the Anamalais and thence southwards along the
Western Ghats. The Nilgiri tahr prefers open terrain, cliffs and
grass-covered hills, a habitat largely confined to altitudes from
1200 to 2600 m. Their habitat extended far and wide all along these
hills in the past, but hunting and habitat destruction have decimated
them to such an extent that they now exist only in a few isolated
sites - the Nilgiri hills, the high ranges in Central Kerala and
the Anamalai hills about 100 Kms to the South and some pockets in
the Southern tip of the peninsula.
Forests
covered much of the plateau in the past, with grasslands only in
boggy hollows and on steep slopes. Annual fires during the dry seasons
in January and February and grazing by domestic buffalo belonging
to the original inhabitants, pushed back the forests slowly until
only patches of it remained when the first Europeans looking for
areas to plant tea reached these areas in the early years of the
19th century.
According
to reports, the Tahr appears to have roamed at will in vast herds
all over the grassy uplands of the higher plateau of the Nilgiris.
By the closing years of the 19th century, uncontrolled hunting and
poaching had however, reduced the tahr to such an extent that their
numbers probably did not exceed a hundred. But survive they did
- on the perilous western edge of the plateau, an area remote from
human habitation where the huge cliffs and inclement weather naturally
protected them.
For
more pictures click
Source
: www.tahrfoundation.org
|
 |
|